Bombshell: Elizabeth Warren Has Seen Evidence Russia Hacked into Voting System
This is something I’ve been asking myself for a few months. How do we know they didn’t?
And now in a new interview Elizabeth Warren reveals that she’s seen ‘convincing evidence’ Russia hacked into ‘US systems to influence the election.
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) April 21, 2017
For a few months I’ve been asking about this. For one thing there are these Guccifer 2.0 tweets on November 4.
— GUCCIFER 2.0 (@GUCCIFER_2) November 4, 2016
I'll be an independent observer at the U.S. #Elections2016
I call on other hackers to monitor the elections from inside the system
— GUCCIFER 2.0 (@GUCCIFER_2) November 4, 2016
While the hacks of the DNC are famous, it’s not realized that they also took the DNC voter files.
“The DNC hack, hosted by Hostkey and Chayanov, would have had access to Vertica, the DNC’s voter registration server. This server had all the DNC’s information on all their voters and where they lived, voting records and so forth. Vertica had the DNC’s voter addresses, campaign modeling and so forth. It was the goldmine. It was everything.”
“An analytics data program maintained by the DNC, and used by our campaign and a number of other entities, was accessed as part of the DNC hack,” said Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill.
Honestly, one of the many unexplained things is why government officials-from Obama on down-are so confident there was no hacking of the machines themselves. There had been prior to the election. It it because voting machines are the one thing impregnable to hacking? Hardly.
“The revelation this month that a cyberattack on the DNC is the handiwork of Russian state security personnel has set off alarm bells across the country: Some officials have suggested that 2016 could see more serious efforts to interfere directly with the American election. The DNC hack, in a way, has compelled the public to ask the precise question the Princeton group hoped they’d have asked earlier, back when they were turning voting machines into arcade games: If motivated programmers could pull a stunt like this, couldn’t they tinker with the results in November through the machines we use to vote?”
“This week, the notion has been transformed from an implausible plotline in a Philip K. Dick novel into a deadly serious threat, outlined in detail by a raft of government security officials. “This isn’t a crazy hypothetical anymore,” says Dan Wallach, one of the Felten-Appel alums and now a computer science professor at Rice. “Once you bring nation states’ cyber activity into the game?” He snorts with pity. “These machines, they barely work in a friendly environment.”
“The powers that be seem duly convinced. Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson recently conceded the “longer-term investments we need to make in the cybersecurity of our election process.” A statement by 31 security luminaries at the Aspen Institute issued a public statement: “Our electoral process could be a target for reckless foreign governments and terrorist groups.” Declared Wired: “America’s Electronic Voting Machines Are Scarily Easy Targets.”
This is what they were saying before the election. After we were seeing handwaving dismissals. Suddenly voting machines are impregnable to hacking.
Even though data scientists noticed that Hillary’s numbers in swing states were systematically lower in districts that use machines.
- Experts say that Clinton‘s votes in counties where computers count votes were lower than those that use paper ballots
- That suggests hackers may have been able to get into the polling machines and artificially weed out Clinton votes to give Trump the edge, they say
- The group, which includes voting rights and computer experts, is lobbying the Clinton team to demand a recount
- They presented their data to Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, and general counsel Marc Elias, last Thursday
- But time is short for the Clinton team to call recounts, and the White House is discouraging them as it’s eager to ease the transition to Trump
- No direct evidence of hacking has been found, and no suspects named, although the DNC blamed Russia for earlier hacks into Democrats’ emails
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3963284/Experts-say-Hillary-Clinton-s-votes-hacked-want-recount-Michigan-Pennsylvania-Wisconsin.html#ixzz4ezaU8OUn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Of course, this was ignored and derided by most pundits. The fact that there is no direct evidence of hacking was found it was presumed this means it didn’t happen. Not true. An effective crime leaves no direct evidence.
As for direct evidence what do those Guccifer 2.0 tweets tell you? Incidentally it seems that Guccifer 2.0 was doing this on behalf of Roger Stone.
Guccifer 2.0 had RTed this article for Stone.
Nor was this the last Stone said about ‘rigging’ in the next 3 months.
So there is good reason to wonder if the vote wasn’t hacked in the swing states. But now Elizabeth Warren has seen real evidence of this.
For now the Beltway media is ignoring Russia. They’re trying to normalize Trump again-ever since the Syrian strike, the media tone has gone a 180. All it takes is him bombing a country to convince pundits he’s not crazy.
But at some point this will make it back to MSM. For now, I’m surprised that Rachel Maddow had nothing about Warren’s find last night. Hopefully she will soon.
P.S. As we saw in my poll out last week, the long awaited poll results are in, and right now I’m just 11 points down vs. Peter King (GOP-NY-District 2). And the voters don’t even know who I am yet.
There is nothing more important in getting answers to Trump-Russia collusion than a Democratic House in 2019. Please donate to help me in my part of the effort to fight for a Dem House.
Thank you. We must have a Dem House. And so, we will.