Intel Source: Russians Planted Fake Hillary Clinton Emails
At this point, how can anything surprise us? We’re through the Looking Glass:
“A new [intelligence community] source is telling me that Russian Intelligence planted phony emails on Hillary’s server designed to torpedo her campaign,” asserted this evening Claude Taylor (link), a political operative who worked in the Bill Clinton White House. During the course of the long running Trump-Russia scandal, his sources have had a history of ultimately being proven right. But you don’t have to wait to see at least some circumstantial evidence to support this assertion.”
“After the Russian government hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee and other sources close to Hillary Clinton, it gave them to WikiLeaks for release. And yet some of those emails appear to have been outright falsified. For instance WikiLeaks posted one batch of supposed emails from Hillary that turned out to have instead been text lifted from a 2012 news article (link). In another instance WikiLeaks published emails supposedly from top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, but it bizarrely displayed her email address as the nonsensical “AbedinH©state.goy” – which used a copyright symbol instead of an @ symbol (link). This looks like a sloppy attempt at a counterfeit email by someone who doesn’t understand the significance of “.gov” in politics, or the absurdity of substituting it with “.goy” instead.”
“This is of course a single-sourced story. But most of the publicly known details of the Trump-Russia scandal to date have originated from single sources or intel community leaks, and much of it has subsequently been verified. So take this latest claim about the Russians and Hillary Clinton for what you think it’s worth. But these are the kinds of well sourced allegations that the media should be digging deeper into, not dismissing outright, particularly when outside circumstantial evidence lends credence to the claims.”
This would be hard to believe without everything we’ve already discovered. Like we’ve just learnt that Comey decided to give his press conference based on hacked documents from the Russians. Wish I was kidding.
As for planted documents, based on what Roger Stone tells us in his 2016 book of the election, it seems that Huma Abedin’s emails on her husband, Anthony Weiner’s laptop, were planted.
This jibes with Abedin’s clear surprise that her emails were found on Weiner’s laptop.
“Abedin tells colleagues she’s in dark about new email trove.”
“Clinton aide said to be unsure how emails ended up in her husband’s laptop, and what their significance could be.”
Here’s what the significance is: Stone’s buddy Jeremy Corsi-the very nice guy who wrote both Unfit for Command that slandered John Kerry’s military service-and started the birther conspiracy theory-wanted to get Huma’s emails to the FBI.
They had been obtained by Judicial Watch. Then they magically turned up on Weiner’s laptop who very conveniently was suddenly caught sexting a minor-who may not have really been a minor. All very convenient.
Speaking of Roger Stone, he also stated on CSPAN last year that he had spoken to Assange about getting his hands on the famous 30,000 emails Hillary didn’t turn over to the FBI; she didn’t as they were private.
“On the C-SPAN show, Stone told Politico’s Alex Isenstadt of his communication to Assange “through an intermediary—somebody who is a mutual friend”—regarding the 30,000 emails the Clinton staff deleted before turning over the contents of the server to Justice Department investigators. (Clinton maintains that only emails of a personal nature were deleted.) Asked to corroborate Assange’s threat of “an October surprise” to stem from that trove, Stone offered a suggestion he clearly deemed to be more helpful to the Trump campaign.”
These are the same 30,000 emails Trump asked Russia to hack: Russia are you listening?
Active measures. Coordination. Hostile foreign power. Treason. Maybe Comey too. Truly the biggest scandal in American history.
As an aside Stone also said this in that interview:
“Well, first of all, I think Julian Assange is a hero; I think he’s taking on the deep state, both Republican and Democrat,” Stone began. He went on to say, “I believe that he is in possession of all of those emails that Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, the Clinton aides, believe they deleted. That and a lot more. These are like the Watergate tapes…”
Every time Roger Stone-of CREEP, who at 19 delivered the Canucks letter that destroyed Ed Muskie’s 1972 campaign; Muskie was the Dem candidate Nixon most feared-invokes Watergate you have to shake your head at such Nixonian mendacity.
And Assange has taken on both parties? When in the 2016 election did he take on Republicans? I’ll wait.
This is a few of Assange’s most recent tweets:
Clearly Assange is an impartial, nonpartisan whistleblower. He has nothing against Hillary Clinton
— mike sax (@mikesaxny2) April 24, 2017
UPDATE: Julian Assange just liked this above tweet of mine. Wow. I can never wash this tweet finger again…
P.S. As we saw in my poll out last week, the long awaited poll results are in, and right now I’m just 11 points down vs. Peter King (GOP-NY-District 2). And the voters don’t even know who I am yet.
There is nothing more important in getting answers to Trump-Russia collusion than a Democratic House in 2019. Please donate to help me in my part of the effort to fight for a Dem House.
Thank you. We must have a Dem House. And so, we will.